If you believe in God, then Health Care Politics …

Politics-of-Jesus-ButtonThe healthcare debate is loud and earnest. As it should be. We are talking about very fundamental, elementary issues of living together in community. We are continuing the national discernment process begun in the 18th century of establishing what it means to say that our Creator endowed all hu(man)s with certain unalienable rights. Among those, our declarators determined, were life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The framers assumed every reasonable person would agree with these given presuppositions. But the conclusion that followed as been anything but self-evident. We have a hard time reaching consensus with the practice of this reasonable theoretical assumption.  All that seems self-evident to me is the premise that there is some correlation between one’s religious beliefs and political values and that there are some level of human rights that ought to be non-negotiable.

debateBringing theory to practice has been the stuff of American politics and it is the stuff of the current debate. But the debate has turned ugly and shrill and out of order. I’m wondering if we’re all on the same page of the hymn book. Maybe the set of assumptions that begin my logic is not where others are beginning.   Maybe we’re not talking about the same thing. Because some people seem to be incredulous and shocked that I could have reached the conclusion that our country should have a national health plan. It’s as though this conclusion was somehow, un-American or un-godly or un-reasonable. All I know to do at this point is be very clear with my thought process and hope that someone will tell me where my logic takes such a radically different path than conservatives.

ist2_7447952-faith-and-politicsLet me begin by explaining what my faith has to do with my desire for universal coverage. Regarding the relationship between religion and politics – folk have argued with me about this correlation for decades; usually after I preached a sermon that didn’t sit well with them.  But I think one’s politics is a byproduct of one’s worldview, one’s faith system. I am not talking about a specific creed or confession; just an individual’s conscious or unconscious belief system of who they are as an individual, who they are in relation to others, the relationship between humanity to the rest of the natural world and the relationship of a Higher Power, or lack thereof, to all these things.  At its most basic definition, politics is how we organize relationships with one another.  The values that determine that organizational structure stems from a worldview we have imagined to be rightly ordered.

creationFor example, our founding fathers believed that a Higher Power created all ‘men’ (sic) as equal members of the human race; no inherent superiority or inferiority. Additionally, the very act of that divine creation ‘gave’ a certain level of dignity and worth to the human being. Because of that dignified worth, each individual has the right to be treated accordingly. An obvious example of how this is manifested in our social ordering (politics) is the idea of death fights. Dog fights and cock fights are offensive to many, but most people do not consider them on the same level of atrocity as gladiator fights. Gladiator fights are considered atrocious because most of us do not believe that the human being exists as ‘sport’ for the gods. Less obvious is how this has developed into the right to protect oneself, to make a living, to be educated, to own property. Today, we are asking what determines a human being’s access to healthcare. Is it by virtue of money? Employment? Health? Social standing? Intelligence? Merit? Marital Status? Or is it one of those inherited rights? I believe that the health of an individual is of grave importance to the Creator. In my tradition, a lot of biblical ink is devoted to the curing of the sick and teaching how to care for the sick. I get the impression that I’m suppose to love my neighbor by caring for her when she’s sick even if I don’t think she deserves it. Because God think she deserves it.  (to be continued …)

good_samaritan

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • LinkedIn
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • email
  • Print

Sarah Bennett is an Episcopal priest in the Diocese of Texas. She is an avid evangelist of social media and honest, authentic conversations of the spiritual journey.  I’m an Episcopal priest in Austin, TX. I am working to develop a new ministry strategy that deepens community bonds, stimulates theological conversations, and reaches out to others through social networking. I have been energized by Clay Shirky’s book, Here Comes Everybody, and am fascinated by the power, good and bad, of novel collaborative efforts now made possible by the internet. Read more from this author


7 Responses to “If you believe in God, then Health Care Politics …”


  1. 1 Bob ChapmanNo Gravatar

    On the evening of August 12, 2009, US Rep. Rick Larsen held a town hall meeting for about 3,000 people in Everett Memorial Stadium–home of the A-league baseball Aquasox.

    I dabble enough in politics to know that at some point every politician engages in “the means justifies the end.” Sausage making and the legislative process have a lot in common. And I like a good sausage.

    Even so, I was made aware of something last night that went beyond sausage making. A little old lady was in tears at this town hall meeting because she was convinced that, if health care reform passes, she was going to die because she did not have long distance service on her telephone.

    Yes, you read that right. She believes not having long distance service was going to kill her if reform passes.

    When the chair of the Snohomish County Democrats asked why she thought that. Her reply was that she was going to have to call a central switchboard in Washington, DC, to make an appointment with her doctor here in northwest Washington State. That is what she was told by a group of people that she had every reason to trust.

    When the chair tried to explain that there was no central switchboard in any of the health care reform bills filled in Congress, he discovered that the people that told her that were all around her. Her “friends” told her that the chair was telling a lie and that it really was in the bill that she was going to have to call a central switchboard to make an appointment.

    When the chair looked at someone that appeared to be their leader of this group, the leader winked at the chair.

    How low can you go?

    This isn’t spinning a story to your favor. This isn’t telling a half-truth. This is telling an outrageous lie to a person so that she thinks she will die if health care reform passes.

    In response to such lies, the clear facts about what is being considered must be told. Any distortion of those facts will make the entire message suspect.

    More on this health care forum:
    http://blog.rrchapman.us/2009/08/kabuki-theater-can-be-good-thing.html

    After reading my blog post the following will make sense.

    The right of Congress to establish an Air Force is not mentioned anywhere in the US constitution. Airplanes didn’t exist in the 1700s. If you read “common defense” in the first paragraph of Article I, Section 8 of the constitution to include establishing an Air Force, then you would have to include health care reform under “general welfare.”

    Don’t let the Teabaggers get away with a strict constructionist interpretation of the constitution that prohibits health care legislation. Our general welfare requires it.

  2. 2 TreyNo Gravatar

    Good post Sarah. Once again you remind me there are the sane Christians and the ones that make all the noise.

    Unfortunately most of the noisy ones are idiots and don’t understand what’s on the table or what’s at stake. Instead they latch onto the Fox News “socialism” sound-bite while ironically fretting over the possibility of losing their medicare.

    The religious right could actually do something useful here by supporting universal health care. But they won’t – once again proving the bumper sticker saying that the religious right is neither.

  3. 3 Gregg BennettNo Gravatar

    test

  4. 4 Austen Sandifer WilliamsNo Gravatar

    Excellent post and comments. I agree that there is divisive, angry misinformation that is now characterizing this debate. It’s such a tremendous shame because we in the U.S. are so close to passing real health care reform. I am coming to believe more and more that it is imperative that reasoned, faithful voices like yours stand up to quell the anger and offer a religious perspective to counter fiery rhetoric.

    Thank you.

  5. 5 Aliza BelairNo Gravatar
  6. 6 mundo fetichesNo Gravatar

    I believe this web site holds very excellent written content posts .

  7. 7 Sales VideoNo Gravatar

    Great post, I think blog owners should acquire a lot from this website its really user genial. So much excellent info on here :D .

Leave a Reply



My Wonderings is using WP-Gravatar